Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @d_bhai_company | @lamanadaoficial |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 24,890 | 24,138 |
| Avg views | 9,518 | 24,280 |
| Engagement rate | 38.2% | 100.6% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | Español | Español |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2068 days | 256 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@d_bhai_company
Looks reliable
@lamanadaoficial
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.