Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @hirki96 | @jiaoyisuo0117 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16,998 | 12,939 |
| Avg views | 11,506 | 11,937 |
| Engagement rate | 67.7% | 92.3% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | 中文 | 中文 |
| Category | — | crypto |
| Channel age | 310 days | 268 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@hirki96
Looks reliable
@jiaoyisuo0117
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.